Ok, here's the newest newspaper article:
http://www.valleyvoicenewspaper.com/tv/stories/2010/tv_chickens_0647.htm
This is the part that I love: "While Miller may be an outstanding pet owner who properly cares for her hens, that is not true of everyone and the communicable disease division of the Tulare County Health and Human Services Agency has outlined enough potential problems with backyard hens to cause him concern, Chief Code Enforcement Officer Frank Furtaw said.
Chickens are potential carriers and spreaders of salmonella bacteria, Furtaw said. This is the reason why poultry farmers wear protective clothing.
Introducing chickens into residential zones could also increase the presence of blue tick lice and other parasites and they could indirectly bring in the rare but deadly Hanta virus, which is associated with rats and mice fecal matter, because chicken feed is attractive to rodents, he said."
I'll be researching the silly health claims, so I have some common sense on paper to hand to the council. Of course, salmonella is associated with LARGE chicken production, where the birds can not live natuarally. They wear protective suits because they have a million chickens crammed into a warehouse the size of my house. Also, I wonder just how many cases of Hanta virus are reported in country areas of the US every year?
I know the city council will see through these scare tactics. Our next meeting is Sept 7th. Any links anyone wants to share would be appreciated!