Food for thought:
No one expects a pet owner to have 'thousands just laying idle in the bank" and no one is trying to deliberately be mean to anyone in particular about this subject. I personally think it's a great discussion to have and one every pet owner, or potential pet owner, should consider.
However, I do believe an animal deserves to be owned by a person who can afford to get it treatment if it needs it.
Or at the very least to be able to make payments to a vet they've established a relationship with that trusts them to pay their bill.
I had a mare who needed emergency surgery to try and save her life. My vet told me what it would cost and I said do it. The surgery was not successful and I had to put my girl down.
Not only did I lose my mare, but I owed a HUGE vet bill. However, I had known Doc Mike for YEARS and had always paid my bill so it was easy to set up payment arrangements and pay him off little by little. It took me almost a year, but I never missed a payment. This is not to say I could not afford the horse because I didn't have "thousands just laying idle in the bank", it meant that this was an unforeseen, unusual expense that was not in my budget. As the animals owner I was responsible for her health and well being. I had the ability to handle the situation when a vet was required. It means NOT owning an animal unless you can do that, in my humble opinion, because they deserve to have antibiotics, pain medication and proper care when the situation calls for it.
Anyone who knows me knows I would re-home, sell, or give away any animal I could not afford to take care of. It would be hard because I LOVE having animals and taking care of them, but they are solely dependent upon my judgment, so shouldn't I be selfless in making decisions about their health care and well being?
No one expects a pet owner to have 'thousands just laying idle in the bank" and no one is trying to deliberately be mean to anyone in particular about this subject. I personally think it's a great discussion to have and one every pet owner, or potential pet owner, should consider.
However, I do believe an animal deserves to be owned by a person who can afford to get it treatment if it needs it.
Or at the very least to be able to make payments to a vet they've established a relationship with that trusts them to pay their bill.
I had a mare who needed emergency surgery to try and save her life. My vet told me what it would cost and I said do it. The surgery was not successful and I had to put my girl down.
Not only did I lose my mare, but I owed a HUGE vet bill. However, I had known Doc Mike for YEARS and had always paid my bill so it was easy to set up payment arrangements and pay him off little by little. It took me almost a year, but I never missed a payment. This is not to say I could not afford the horse because I didn't have "thousands just laying idle in the bank", it meant that this was an unforeseen, unusual expense that was not in my budget. As the animals owner I was responsible for her health and well being. I had the ability to handle the situation when a vet was required. It means NOT owning an animal unless you can do that, in my humble opinion, because they deserve to have antibiotics, pain medication and proper care when the situation calls for it.
Anyone who knows me knows I would re-home, sell, or give away any animal I could not afford to take care of. It would be hard because I LOVE having animals and taking care of them, but they are solely dependent upon my judgment, so shouldn't I be selfless in making decisions about their health care and well being?