Oh really... GJENSEN... I could bend your ear for a while if you're awake. Always trying to figure out feeds and such. What to plant, etc., etc., etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh really... GJENSEN... I could bend your ear for a while if you're awake. Always trying to figure out feeds and such. What to plant, etc., etc., etc.
Quote: Quote: This is where I get confused, does it specifically state measured from horizontal or just from the juncture of tail and back (don't have my SOP on hand at the moment)? I quoted Walt's response on this topic above, from earlier on this thread. Walt had the same response when queried on this on the CSU thread "For those that have asked.........The angle of the tail is determine by the back............wherever the tail meets the back. You would use the back line to determine the tail angle." Post 2010. There was even mention that the illustrations in the SOP are misleading because they use a bird with a horizontal back, giving the impression it is measured from horizontal.
This is where I get confused, does it specifically state measured from horizontal or just from the juncture of tail and back (don't have my SOP on hand at the moment)? I quoted Walt's response on this topic above, from earlier on this thread. Walt had the same response when queried on this on the CSU thread "For those that have asked.........The angle of the tail is determine by the back............wherever the tail meets the back. You would use the back line to determine the tail angle." Post 2010. There was even mention that the illustrations in the SOP are misleading because they use a bird with a horizontal back, giving the impression it is measured from horizontal.
Yeah I noticed that the individual breeds now state above horizontal, I think that was an update to the 2010 SOP. That and those two figures kinda lead me to think that it was measured from the back except when specifically stated from horizontal... Not at all confusing.
This is where I get confused, does it specifically state measured from horizontal or just from the juncture of tail and back (don't have my SOP on hand at the moment)? I quoted Walt's response on this topic above, from earlier on this thread. Walt had the same response when queried on this on the CSU thread "For those that have asked.........The angle of the tail is determine by the back............wherever the tail meets the back. You would use the back line to determine the tail angle." Post 2010. There was even mention that the illustrations in the SOP are misleading because they use a bird with a horizontal back, giving the impression it is measured from horizontal.
I remember the previous discussion and checked my standard. The breed descriptions only give the specific angle of the tail. In my standard, on page 17 at the top it shows two diagrams: Figure 10 "Diagram Showing Degrees above Horizontal" and Figure 11: "Measuring Tail Angles" shows a flat backed bird with at tail at 30 degrees. I'm taking my cue from Figure 10. It says "degrees above horizontal"
I hesitated to state this but this is all I can find regarding measuring tail angles.
Quickly looking for a more positive example, I read about the Sussex fowl. On the male it says: "Tail: Of medium length, well-spread, carried at an angle of 45 degrees above horizontal." And then scanning again quickly, every breed I see, states the degree of angle "ABOVE HORIZONTAL"
Quote: Jason Paige? Bet he will be at the show in Springfield.
Excellent idea, if for no other reason than to see all the various types of birds on display. Always get something you like the looks of, you'll be looking at it every day when you chore it!See Joseph at Yellow House Farm for very good dorkings. ANd there are several buckeye breeders in MA. Are you going to the Northeastern Congress?? I t is in Springfield-- in January I think. PM me for buckeyes info.
Jason Paige? Bet he will be at the show in Springfield.
The Sussex is always said to have a flat level back. Thus measuring the angle of the tail in a Sussex from the angle of the back. Anyway, a bird's tail is connected to its body, not the ground. If one is measuring tail angle to help determine symmetry in the bird, why would one use a measurement that is not intrinsic to the bird? i.e. the ground on which it stands. Using the ground as a measuring tool may help to create symmetry in a landscape but not within the bird itself.I remember the previous discussion and checked my standard. The breed descriptions only give the specific angle of the tail. In my standard, on page 17 at the top it shows two diagrams: Figure 10 "Diagram Showing Degrees above Horizontal" and Figure 11: "Measuring Tail Angles" shows a flat backed bird with at tail at 30 degrees. I'm taking my cue from Figure 10. It says "degrees above horizontal"
I hesitated to state this but this is all I can find regarding measuring tail angles.
Quickly looking for a more positive example, I read about the Sussex fowl. On the male it says: "Tail: Of medium length, well-spread, carried at an angle of 45 degrees above horizontal." And then scanning again quickly, every breed I see, states the degree of angle "ABOVE HORIZONTAL"