Quote:
Of course there were more nations - lots more. But those were the major powers involved. France was taken out during the war, though they did put up a good fight.
A strong central government... Yeah, right. It's been pointed out many a time that, first of all, a strong central government is more likely to abuse its power than a more local state government, and second of all that an abuse of power by the central government would be far more damaging than an abuse of power by state governments.
Mom's folly - so much in that post is completely ridiculous. You seriously think that the Confederacy, which could only launch effective DEFENSIVE campaigns, would have for some bizarre reason invaded and somehow conquered the United States?
President Davis summed it up this way - "All we ask is to be let alone."
Let's put this as simply as possible - which do you value more? Union, or liberty? I, for one, choose liberty. Union by voluntary agreement can aid liberty. Union at the point of a gun guarantees tyrrany. We live, not in the voluntary Union that the Founders created, but in the forced union established by the sword under the direction of Abraham Lincoln and the Radical Republicans.