Quote:
Q9 doesn't always take dissenting opinions well. It is a shame, because when he isn't being like that, he is fun to carry on a conversation with
You serious?
He made calm pointed statements (for the most part, even in the face of antagonism) and backed them up with factual accounts.
He attempted to use that to bring the conversation to a crux....a principle only to be dragged back into the confusion of peripheral details seeming designed to avoid him arriving at any point he might make that wasn't the one people wanted to hear.
He was poo pooed at every turn.
How long did you want him to continue once he saw it was pointless?
Of all of the forums I hang in this is by far the most statist, blindly trusting, big government worshiping one. Shame, I love the chicken advice.
If it weren't for people like Q9 this place might as well be Huffpo.