I just want to make a really important point:
If a citizen is given wrong or inaccurate information regarding local laws by a civil employee, and the citizen relies on that information to their detriment, the civil employee and the government will generally not be held responsible for the error.
So even if you speak with a civil employee who should, due to their job, be in a position to know what the chicken keeping regulations might be for your town, and they give you the wrong information, they are not held responsible for the ramifications if you act on the wrong information.
Yes its true , and this has been argued in a lot of case law. Basically, statutes are public records, and each citizen is expected to read and understand the law for themselves. You should never rely on hearsay information from a civil employee.
I hope I don't sound harsh, but I think alot of people might not know this. Alwasy read the actual regulation yourself.
~Phyllis
If a citizen is given wrong or inaccurate information regarding local laws by a civil employee, and the citizen relies on that information to their detriment, the civil employee and the government will generally not be held responsible for the error.
So even if you speak with a civil employee who should, due to their job, be in a position to know what the chicken keeping regulations might be for your town, and they give you the wrong information, they are not held responsible for the ramifications if you act on the wrong information.
Yes its true , and this has been argued in a lot of case law. Basically, statutes are public records, and each citizen is expected to read and understand the law for themselves. You should never rely on hearsay information from a civil employee.
I hope I don't sound harsh, but I think alot of people might not know this. Alwasy read the actual regulation yourself.
~Phyllis