Quote:
Sorry, but not all cats that are outdoors are feral. Mine can't be kept indoors in the warm months, however she rarely leaves my property and has never attacked anything bigger than a mole. Unless the cat has done damage to livestock it should be considered someone's pet and not shot. Of course I have neighbors close enough to see my house. I might feel differently if I lived in the sticks with no neighbor house visable.
Um... yes they are. I own two cats and they are kept indoors. Any cat outside is feral, unless you are standing there with it. If I see it prowling my pens, it dies. It doesn't have to attack, it just spooks the birds into breaking their necks. Your pet vs. my family's food = Your pet loses.
It's my opinion that if you own a pet that you allow to "free-range" on other people's property (or in the woods, or wherever) and cause damage, then you are irresponsible. Lots of cat owners will likely chime in and say that they do it, but that doesn't make it right. If this was someone's dog running around and killing livestock, would you think differently? If so, why?
The OP has already stated that the cat had killed some of her chicks. That constitutes "damage to livestock" and thus, by your own logic, no longer is saved by being considered "someone's pet and not shot." Sorry if I appear harsh, and I admit I'm not a fan of cats, but I will never understand how it's somehow "allowable" for people to let their cats out while unattended, with no regard for property lines, killing whatever they can catch. It's all fine and dandy if you have barn cats to control pests on your property, but once they are in a neighbor's yard, now THEY are the pests.
~Chris