I like the idea of a .22 revolver a lot. Unfortunately when you're talking about a revolver worth having, which means a major American maker like Ruger or S&W, you're talking about $500 and up. But to have something I can carry with me and get critters as they pop up, well, a .22 revolver's next on my list if I get the money together. Revolvers and .22 "snake shot" cartridges are made for each other too - those shot cartridges don't work well with a long, rifled, barrel and they often don't extract well which can be hard on the extractor on a semi-auto.
The Henry company supposedly has really good customer service, that's another plus.
I have a Ruger "ranch rifle" in .223 around here.
That's a good point about all those cartridges in that tube magazine in a lever-action. But at least the hammer's external, and any gun with the action closed should be treated as loaded anyway. The Marlin has a safety where even if the hammer falls, if the trigger's not being pressed too, it won't fire. I'm not sure about the Henry, frankly myself I don't use or rely on safeties. Loaded but "on safe" for me with the Henry I guess would be with a round in the chamber but the hammer down. Then if I need to fire in a hurry I just pull the hammer back. But the Henry may have a safety that works like the Marlin, and it may be actually better to use that. Generally if I have rounds in the magazine, I have the chamber empty and when I have to shoot it means I work the action to chamber a round. OK unless you're trying to not spook a game animal or varmint.
Mods - thanks for moving my thread, I guess it does belong here more than in the general ramblings.