@BlueTheBrahma these are the pics she just sent me, still the wrong angle on the 2, but the one of the roo is nice
I’ll give it a go, this is the cockerel’s score, the hens actually look better than him. I also can’t tell if the cockerel in the good photo is the same as the one we see from the front.
Type, carriage & table merit:
18/40
Decent length of back but needs to be deeper throughout. Looks wide in the front but breast could be fuller. Tail quite nice but held too high.
Size and quality: 12/20
The photo might not be doing justice but the hackle looks too thin. He looks to be on the small side but it’s hard to decide without anything to compare to.
Colouring and markings: 9/15
A correct and even shade of copper but a little dull. Needs more copper throughout the saddle, almost no red where it should be in the shoulders. Black looks good and glossy. The hens too are under coloured so it seems to be consistent in this line.
Head: 7/10
Again looks different in the two photos. Wattles really nice, no twists and round. Left earlobe looks suspiciously pale, but good shape. Comb looks even but serrations flopping in different locations. If the comb was straighter it would be good. Eye nice and orange, beak good.
Condition: 8/10
Not the brightest red in the face but no sign of illness. The offspring will have redder faces if maintained well and healthy.
Legs and feet: 4/5
Feathered correctly and correct colour. Could be a little shorter but seem to be well set apart. A clearer distinction between pink/white and slate shading would be ideal, but I don’t know how important that is.
Total: 58/100
I really think the photos aren’t doing him justice. The hens have good type, other than their high tails. There is a good chance your chicks will score higher than this. The main things to worry about is the high tail and lack of full colouring. The cockerel here also looks young so he could improve with age. I’d score them hens on average around 65-70.