Is there currently a recessive white version of the Silkie? Specifically iiCCoo?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there currently a recessive white version of the Silkie? Specifically iiCCoo?
Quote:
I'll start over ... Are these Recessive White Silkies you are referring to c/c or o/o?
so far ALL of the White Silkie crosses I have seen have confirmed that the white you see on white silkies is actually Recessive in nature and not dominantIs there currently a recessive white version of the Silkie? Specifically iiCCoo?
its c/cI'll start over ... Are these Recessive White Silkies you are referring to c/c or o/o?
Quote:
Hi, nicalandia, (Thanks for replies go to nicalandia and Henk.)
o/o is the gene that Quinn wrote of in the 30s. It was a plumage gene, at the time, that was common in the Silkies unless Quinn was a kook which I don't think he was. He was just someone trying to describe what he was seeing genetically in a certain group of chickens.
I decided to ask if the plumage gene was still extant by using the same nomenclature that he did which was "iiCCoo." I thought folks like you and the other participants of this thread (donrae, Sonoran Silkies, Henk) would already know about it (or its demise) since Quinn's work has been mentioned "elsewhere" a few times.
Quinn claimed that "pp" (referring to plumage in the 30s, not pea comb) was a new type of "Recessive White." Hutt later referred to it as "rs." (Hutt made no attempt to discredit Quinn's work, so I have no reason to suppose that Quinn was wrong at the time to use "iiCCoo.") Since I've never bred Silkies, well, except to see how their setting/brooding skills are, I am clueless as to what their genotype is. In addition, they are quite different from many breeds with their Fm, crest, mutated feathers (said with respect, of course), blue earlobes, etc. So, since I'd never heard of "o/o" myself prior to a few years ago, I figured I'd better ask before skipping a step by not test mating with Silkies.
Quinn used iiCCoo Silkies when doing his test matings. Quinn, interestingly enough, used "iiccOO" to indicate the genotype of the White Plymouth Rocks and White Wyandottes that he also used to test matings. So his description of Silkies was not a typo; it was intentional.
Thankfully, it would seem, o/o is no longer in Silkies (based on the reactions in this thread to my question), so now I don't have to use Silkies for my test matings.
Since I've never bred Silkies, well, except to see how their setting/brooding skills are, I am clueless as to what their genotype is. In addition, they are quite different from many breeds with their Fm, crest, mutated feathers (said with respect, of course), blue earlobes, etc. So, since I'd never heard of "o/o" (plumage version, I know the current egg shell notation) myself prior to a few years ago, I figured I'd better ask before skipping a step in test mating.
Please, anyone, correct me if I'm wrong about the following:
If I use c/c chickens to test for Recessive White, I can use homozygous c/c, i+/i+ White Plymouth Rocks and/or White Wyandottes and/or even White Orpingtons. Right? I can skip test matings with White Silkies, right? Because all current White Silkies are all c/c, right?
Thanks so much!
some of this c/c birds do carry dominant white too, so to be 100% sure I would do a test mating to a normal bird that does not have c/C+Please, anyone, correct me if I'm wrong about the following:
If I use c/c chickens to test for Recessive White, I can use homozygous c/c, i+/i+ White Plymouth Rocks and/or White Wyandottes and/or even White Orpingtons. Right? I can skip test matings with White Silkies, right? Because all current White Silkies are all c/c, right?
Thanks so much!
Also, I have never heard of Quinn. Do you have any references to his works?