perchville wrote:
I've read Silent Spring, sorry you didn't understand that.
I don't know who is right or wrong in this discussion but if this was a debate you would be the looser, hands down. So you read it. That doesn't make it true. Q9 has already stated that a onetime supporter he names found flaws in the source material. Sounds to me like he understood Silent Spring better than you or at least didn't take it at face value.
Surely if you were really passionate about the subject that you would not be lazy and would post your research. Lazy usually = no research done.
I've read Silent Spring, sorry you didn't understand that.
I don't know who is right or wrong in this discussion but if this was a debate you would be the looser, hands down. So you read it. That doesn't make it true. Q9 has already stated that a onetime supporter he names found flaws in the source material. Sounds to me like he understood Silent Spring better than you or at least didn't take it at face value.
Surely if you were really passionate about the subject that you would not be lazy and would post your research. Lazy usually = no research done.

Gee whiz, you're like arguing with my cousins!
I guess your cousins must be like Q9 and respond with supporting documentation. I have to conclude that you do not have lazy cousins.
Thanks Q9 for responding with earlier with the sources of your side when asked.
I guess your cousins must be like Q9 and respond with supporting documentation. I have to conclude that you do not have lazy cousins.

Thanks Q9 for responding with earlier with the sources of your side when asked.
Last edited: