Quote:
STOP already. If you need to discuss this further, go to the other section for ramblings.
We're talking about scientific and psuedoscientific studies pertaining to predators. Yes the thread has strayed a bit as most threads do. But I will do my best to refrain from any more participation here, not because I am yielding to an opposing view (which opposing view still hasn't produced any reliable studies) but because you have demanded we do so and because the thread has strayed from the OP.
Last thing I'll say (I swear). As far as I can see, the studies I've mentioned are just as credible as the studies the other side has produced, if not more, considering that a significant number of the anti-DDT studies were done by the very' Royal Society and other such organizations who tend to have predetermined conclusions. (TEND to. Not necessarily, but it's likely)
Look at the facts, unbiased. You can decide.
And I'm still fine with shooting hawks that are attacking your animals.
STOP already. If you need to discuss this further, go to the other section for ramblings.
We're talking about scientific and psuedoscientific studies pertaining to predators. Yes the thread has strayed a bit as most threads do. But I will do my best to refrain from any more participation here, not because I am yielding to an opposing view (which opposing view still hasn't produced any reliable studies) but because you have demanded we do so and because the thread has strayed from the OP.
Last thing I'll say (I swear). As far as I can see, the studies I've mentioned are just as credible as the studies the other side has produced, if not more, considering that a significant number of the anti-DDT studies were done by the very' Royal Society and other such organizations who tend to have predetermined conclusions. (TEND to. Not necessarily, but it's likely)
Look at the facts, unbiased. You can decide.
And I'm still fine with shooting hawks that are attacking your animals.
![wink.png](https://www.backyardchickens.com/img/smilies/wink.png)