My apologies if anyone got the impression I was slandering or discrediting anyone with my comment earlier re: who created what first.
It has been my understanding that Middleton has been THE person responsible for Lav Orps. Even if Hinkjc and Wilds of PA did not import (which, I never said they did) are they also entitled to the same level of 'credit' for 'creating' the birds because it is a different country with different bloodlines? Or in this case would be it for 'developing' their own lines?
I'm not saying developing their own strains was not in itself years of careful work, which is clearly has been - they both breed some very lovely birds that I hear nothing but great things about.
If I or the OP took a lav ameraucana and a black orp - and through years our own careful and tireless work created fluffy lav orps, would we also get the same level of recognition as 'creators' of lav orps? I would guess no, because other people have already done so, and years before the OP or I would have even started.
If Dr. Carefoot gets the solo credit for 'discovering' and 'developing' the chocolate gene then why wouldn't Middleton get the 'credit' for her work with Lavender?
I could very well be completely wrong and off base, and so again, I apologize. I'd just like to know what circumstances qualify someone for 'creating' and which are for 'developing' lines. I really, truly, do not mean to offend, I'm only looking for clarification on the nomenclature.