Well, now... I have "log envy".

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agrees that brooding in coop and integrating young/small is very cool...glad to have participated in the 'new' way.I want to weigh in re: age of integration. When I first joined BYC, I followed the party line: NEVER integrate chicks into the flock until they are as big as the adults... or almost so. 12 weeks was given as the golden standard. So, that's what I did. Integration went ok. Nothing spectacular. Then, MHP entered the scene, along with the increased ease of brooding chicks in the coop. Many of us found that integration went MUCH better when integrating youngsters... (my preference is to integrate between 3 and 6 weeks of age, and the more chicks being integrated, the easier it is) These littles are no where near being sexually mature, and therefore are not considered a threat to the pecking order. They are small enough that they aren't considered any kind of threat. Many of the hens respond to them the way they would to a pesky fly. And the littles are small enough that they can run circles around the older birds.
Re: feed: If calcium in layer feed were an issue, many of us would have chicks dropping dead. Or our hens would not survive to become healthy geriatric hens. And, what about the roosters who all live their whole lives on layer feed. How often do you see a sick rooster? As far as calcium goes, I venture to make an extremely uneducated guess that there is a heavy load of calcium in the diet of any chicken of any age who gets any amount of free range time. Many greens are very high in calcium. Ever seen a chicken chowing down on soil? Gotta be a fair amount of calcium there also. Bugs? Bet those tough exoskeletons are also loaded with it. That being the case, why is it that free range chickens are more healthy??? My preference when raising chicks is to switch the whole flock over to a multi flock feed (with oyster shell and egg shells on the side). If that's not available, I would choose grower. The ONLY reason that I EVER purchase layer feed is b/c it is less expensive.
Me too.....made a mini chunnel instead.Well, now... I have "log envy".
12 x 50 would be better for sure.@Finelyfound
Could you post a photo of how it is configured now?
I am wondering if you could put it end-to-end so that is half deep (12.5).
I'm thinking that would give you 12ish deep and 50ish long.... Then maybe separate the 2 ends from each other with a gap just large enough for them to get out there also... maybe 3-4" apart.
Easter Eggers 'can' have any color legs, technically. But if they are hatchery sourced, they should have yellow skin with a slate wash, resulting in greenish looking legs. Some take longer to turn green in the legs than others. I've got some 2 week olds that are still developing their 'slate' color. It can also be very difficult to see the skin color at only a few days old. All of my chicks have pinkish/white skin for the first couple days after hatch. Then as they age, the skin color becomes more pronounced.Yesterday, at age three-days old, I introduced the sod tray. It was an instant success. I was careful to include some earth worms in the damp soil for added interest, although I don't believe those tiny feet have been able to penetrate the heavy clay soil to expose any yet. But they sure are having a ball scratching around in it.
I had one case of pasty butt yesterday. It was the smallest one that I was worried about from the start because she always seemed to hang back under MHP when the others were out running around. She seems healthy and plenty active now, though.
It dawned on me yesterday that two of them, the lighter colored ones, don't have slate colored feet. Junebuggena, do some EE chicks have white legs? If the hatchery made a mistake, I'm in for a surprise as they develop.