I went to Eggland's website and in my opinion they were quite straight forward with their information. They have organic, cage free, and caged birds. They clearly stated that they have some caged. I dont necessarily agree with them that caged birds are cleaner as they stated but I am sure the person creating the information believes that. They have tried for a long time to position themselves in the market as a premium egg and have been quite successful at it. I have no issue with this it is what businesses do.
As to the vegetarian fed statement. We all know and understand that mad cow disease is spread by feeding animal protiens to cattle, sheep as well for that matter. With all of that attention many folks that were producing meat and eggs decided that it would be a wise marketing position to declare that their meats were produced with no "animal by products." In my opinion this is the term that should be used as opposed to "vegetarian fed" as there is some obvious irony in declaring an animal destined to be eaten as being a vegetarian.
My company did many studies as I am sure others did and it seemed like veg fed resonated better that "no animal by products".
I have no issue with eating a chicken that runs around and eats bugs etc and I am sure very few others do. There are folks and I am one of them that object to chickens being fed offal, feathers and simply any other form of protein that is low cost and available. This veg fed statement is designed to address this concern and there is a small ( in terms of space) opportunity to make this statement on a label and as a result this vegetarian fed statement is the one that has caught on and is commonly used.
This statement now commonly declares that a product is fed with no antibiotics, hormones etc. as well as fed no animal by products For some reason in the natural and organic channel this term veg fed is somewhat all incompassing.
As to the vegetarian fed statement. We all know and understand that mad cow disease is spread by feeding animal protiens to cattle, sheep as well for that matter. With all of that attention many folks that were producing meat and eggs decided that it would be a wise marketing position to declare that their meats were produced with no "animal by products." In my opinion this is the term that should be used as opposed to "vegetarian fed" as there is some obvious irony in declaring an animal destined to be eaten as being a vegetarian.
My company did many studies as I am sure others did and it seemed like veg fed resonated better that "no animal by products".
I have no issue with eating a chicken that runs around and eats bugs etc and I am sure very few others do. There are folks and I am one of them that object to chickens being fed offal, feathers and simply any other form of protein that is low cost and available. This veg fed statement is designed to address this concern and there is a small ( in terms of space) opportunity to make this statement on a label and as a result this vegetarian fed statement is the one that has caught on and is commonly used.
This statement now commonly declares that a product is fed with no antibiotics, hormones etc. as well as fed no animal by products For some reason in the natural and organic channel this term veg fed is somewhat all incompassing.
Last edited:
