I have contacted and communicated directly with my state rep- Andrea LaFontaine. I spoke with her assistant on Friday and he will be calling me today with information. He is contacting someone at the Michigan Farm Bureau. He also said that this EXACT problem (city/township vs BYC) occured last year in the neighboring township and the township was informed that the BYC is protected under RTFA.
I'll report back
blackswan that is terrific news. If there is any chance that chickens will be considered legal there in 2012 but not in 2013 (because of changes to GAAMPS - I would get them in 2012. In that case, even if the change to the 2013 GAAMPS language is successful you will have a good chance of being grandfathered in.
I am also meeting with my state rep, Rebekah Warren, on August 13th. I contacted her when I applied for a position on the Ag Commission (something ANYONE can do - just ask me how) - and she wrote a letter of support to Gov Snyder for my application. I used that communication to ask her to meet with me, and she agreed.
The thing I've been struck by recently with all these GAAMPS language changes is how radical they are. To my way of understanding, the 1999 legislature spread RTF protection to
everyone in the state with a commercial farming operation - and added very strong language to tell local governments not to mess with their decision. Too bad they didn't similarly dissuade MDARD, because the 2012 GAAMPS language exempts everyone who lives in a city of more than 100,000. That is currently 7 cities, and if you add up the populations of those cities you get 1.5 million Michiganders who lost RTF protection - with several more additional cities very close to that 100,000 threshold. The population of Michigan is about 10 million, so that means 15% of us were disenfranchised from RTF protection by MDARD in 2012.
But then comes the 2013 GAAMPS language, which exempts RTF protection from everyone in Michigan who does not live on property that is zoned Agricultural. I couldn't get exact numbers, of course, but the USDA estimates that in 2011 about 1.8 million Michiganders are "rural", and 8 million are "urban". So if the 2013 GAAMPS language passes, 8 million Michiganders - 80 percent of us - lose RTF protection. And all of this is accomplished with a few changes to the language in the GAAMPS, and the votes of exactly 5 unelected Ag Commissioners.
But it is only a draft, and there is still time.