Yeppers, some us disagree (me).
There is no way we can have how ever many billion people that we have without interfering with other species. It is the privilege of the apex species (me).
The deer kept in check by wolves does not hold water in my opinion, we opened areas in woodlands, we made golf courses everywhere that allow deer populations to boom. The we further increase the deer herd by making so many places where deer reside off limits for hunting. Deer are not the smartest creatures on God's green earth, but they are smart enough to know where every safe area is during hunting season. They will stay there after opening day.
This allows wolf populations to get higher than they should be. Wolves are like us, they are opportunistic feeders. It is easier to take a calf, pig, chicken or other farm animal than chase down a deer.
We all want more natural grown animals for our own food. We cannot have that and not have conflicts with nature. I am willing to bet the farmer owning a feedlot in Nebraska has his own conflicts with predators.
I do not think we disturb the circle of life, we are part of it, as any animal in the circle of life we will destroy competitors for food source. We actually are the only species that cares enough to not wipe out all the competitors.
There is not enough predator free land for us all to have our little farms on. So we have two choices:
1) Live amongst the wolves and do the best we can, which incudes destroying some
or
2) reduce the human population by around 6 billion.
For those of you picking the latter, I will start a sign up sheet for euthanasia.
1)
2)
3)
4)
Please only sign your own name to the list not someone else's!
BTW I still value you opinion, even if it is all wrong,,
