Quote:
Did I make it less or more confusing? I'll edit it again after I look something up. Would pure naked neck be (
NaNa) and one copy / not-pure naked neck (
Na)
Because... I didn't know you could get feather-neck chicks from 2 NN parents. I don't think that ever happened here and it's good to know!
More than okay with me to edit and put up somewhere.
Could be it is wires getting crossed up by what exactly is meant by "NN"- could be either Naked Neck or 2 doses of the naked neck gene(my bad if I misunderstand.. had to enertain a nephew all day, am so exhausted right now lol)... "Formally", pure naked neck would be genotype (
NaNa), not pure would be (
Nana+) and feather neck (
na+na+). The + is just a notation to indicate wild type(Henk's calculator uses it for example). Not naked neck is the wild type version for this gene.
For example to apply it to my own example above:
NaNa x
na+na+= 100%
Nana+
Nana+ x
na+na+= 50%
Nana+ 50%
na+na+
Nana+ x
Nana+= 25%
NaNa 50%
Nana+ 25%
na+na+ (this one is how two naked necked parents can throw feather neck chicks)
NaNa x NaNa= 100%
NaNa
Now my turn to worry about making it seem more confusing.. this is just the formal verison of my earlier "NN x buff orp".. this works exactly the same as pure NN/not pure NN x feather neck or NaNa/Nana+ x na+na+... I try to go for what might help the most people understand the general idea at the moment.
So these chicks would have to be (
Na) / not-pure naked neck --- Pure naked neck x feather-neck = 100% naked necked chicks.
Or could they be (
NaNa) / pure for naked neck?
Pure naked neck(
NaNa) x feather neck(
na+na+) would result in 100% naked neck chicks, but all will not be pure(
Nana+)
Not-pure naked neck x feather-neck = 50% naked necked chicks.
I've managed to confuse myself.
No you got the general idea correct it seems to me... Nana+ x na+na+= 50% Nana+(naked neck) and 50% na+na+(feather neck)
edit: Started a
Naked Neck page . Grabbed some neat info from Hutt, "Genetics of the Fowl" on Naked Necks (skip the bit about Feather tumors in canaries and Apterylosis, hahaha).
Great start! Good info on that- has the name and date of the "Na" plus the illustration of feather tract area comparisons to boot.