Quote:
And because it's in a film or in print that makes it true?
Did you look at the article I provided a link to?
They don't give healthy animals antibiotics for no reason. It makes no sense for them to.
They do indeed give "healthy" animals prophylactic antibiotics...but you don't wish to hear that. That is fine, each to his own contaminated foods.
I'll still attempt to NOT feed my animals something I wouldn't put in my own body, as it will eventually get there when I in turn eat them~and you continue to eat commercially raised foods.
I don't know whether it's 100% true or not.....just an article I had read from someone who is on the "other side" of the issue than I am, but was willing to go see it with their own eyes....not only get their facts from someone else's perspective.
I agree it's every one's right to feed themselves and their families and animals as they see fit....whether it's vegetarian, vegan, organic or as most of us do.....the healthiest way we see fit. I don't personally care how nor is it my mission to change your mind on how you want to do things.
What upsets me is when blatent misinformation is stated as fact to support one side or the other.....such as your statement about antibiotics. Unless you are at every feedlot everyday of the year you have no clue as to what they do or don't feed to the cattle. It makes no sense from a economic standpoint to risk what little profit they stand to make by adding meds to the feed when they aren't needed and risk having a whole shipment of beef contaminated. And despite what most animal right's advocates would have you believe the majority of the people connected to feedlots do care about the welfare of the animals that are under their care.
Am I naive and believe that there is nothing that needs to be changed? No I'm not...there is no perfect industry no matter what product they are producing.