When it comes to classical Marek's (paralysis and/or visceral form), it's hard to be 100% sure, as most people can't or won't get a blood test run to "confirm" the Marek's. If a bird had the blood test and it was confirmed Marek's, and it went on to survive, then yes I can say for sure that some birds can make it. Otherwise it is just some very careful guessing. I mean, some folks have confirmed Marek's in their flock, and if a bird shows symptoms of Marek's it is very, very likely that they are seeing Marek's disease even without the confirming blood test. If that bird went on to survive, it's anecdotal, yes, but with a pretty high percentage chance to be true.
Then there are cases like my rooster I'm dealing with right now. I have Marek's in my birds, for sure, as I lost a roo to it in 2013 and had every test run (PCR, lab tests, necropsy, etc) and they confirmed Marek's.
So now I have a new roo and he suddenly can't walk, and is displaying paralysis. I thought it was Marek's, for sure.
But, the PCR blood test came back negative. And it looks like he is going to survive, if things keep improving they way they are (he is up and walking, now!). So, what can I infer from this?
Maybe he never had Marek's symptoms, in which case if I hadn't tested, I would have made an educated guess and said "yes, my rooster had Marek's paralysis, and survived!"
Maybe the test was a false negative? I have been assured that it's extremely unlikely but who knows for sure?
I still don't really know what is going on with my roo. Neurological Marek's makes the most sense, but the blood test says otherwise. It's frustrating!
You can see where this can get confusing.
How many people have a bird get sick, and recover, and say "it recovered from Marek's!" and maybe it was never Marek's in the first place?
How many have had birds "mysteriously die" and actually have Marek's?
Who knows!?!
Now, all of the above is me talking about classical Marek's, with neural lesions (paralysis) and/or lymphomas. I know some of you have had birds with ocular Marek's (a bit easier to diagnose visually!) go on to live.
Then there are cases like my rooster I'm dealing with right now. I have Marek's in my birds, for sure, as I lost a roo to it in 2013 and had every test run (PCR, lab tests, necropsy, etc) and they confirmed Marek's.
So now I have a new roo and he suddenly can't walk, and is displaying paralysis. I thought it was Marek's, for sure.
But, the PCR blood test came back negative. And it looks like he is going to survive, if things keep improving they way they are (he is up and walking, now!). So, what can I infer from this?
Maybe he never had Marek's symptoms, in which case if I hadn't tested, I would have made an educated guess and said "yes, my rooster had Marek's paralysis, and survived!"
Maybe the test was a false negative? I have been assured that it's extremely unlikely but who knows for sure?
I still don't really know what is going on with my roo. Neurological Marek's makes the most sense, but the blood test says otherwise. It's frustrating!
You can see where this can get confusing.
How many people have a bird get sick, and recover, and say "it recovered from Marek's!" and maybe it was never Marek's in the first place?
How many have had birds "mysteriously die" and actually have Marek's?
Who knows!?!

Now, all of the above is me talking about classical Marek's, with neural lesions (paralysis) and/or lymphomas. I know some of you have had birds with ocular Marek's (a bit easier to diagnose visually!) go on to live.