sure, but that’s assuming everyone has that interest and wants to spend their money on that interest.
some people seek out snd spend a lot of money on shoes (for example), but it would be a silly assumption for anyone to expect everyone would seek out lots of new shoes bc they had that same level of interest, yet everyone wears shoes. Some people buy used shoes (which makes other people’s skin crawl from the hygiene perspective) bc they don’t care or can’t/won’t afford new.
back to chickens...we personally have the ability to hunt, my spouse has hunted when younger, and would like to go again. But, time has been short, and we haven’t been able to devote time to that. Can you imagine if everyone went hunting at least 1x? OMG, the crowds in the woods!! And that’s Only assuming 1hunt per person’s teen or adult life.
Bussing people to somewhere to see chickens butchered would likely not work out well either, as a generalization. Wasn’t there a show where Paris Hilton friend went to places in the sticks to experience non-glitz living? Yeah, they were kinda down on it, I think, although never watched the show. The interest for the audience was to see spoiled rich kids experience regular life that many people live, yet it was so foreign to the rich girls, that it’s not like they embraced it just because They experienced it.
my point is just that the concept makes sense, but functional reality isn’t likely.