I can not speak to things that people might or might not have in their hearts. Who among us can know another person's heart? That is not an issue anyway. The issue is protection of one's flock. Predators are opportunists and will seek the easiest way to feed themselves. We have the obligation to care for those animals we own. If some of us hate predators because they complicate our lives; what of it? I hate drunk drivers. So what? They will still drink and kill innocent people regardless. The predators will continue to breed and reproduce and be a threat whether or not some of us hate them and others simply kill the ones who try to kill our flocks.
Being concerned about whether one sets a trap to protect his flock with hate in their heart or simply does it because it is economically more sound to protect an investment than to let a predator destroy that investment is a waste of what might be time that could be better spent elsewhere.
No matter what we say on here, some people will always hate predators and others will not. It will have Zero effect on the world either way. Catching and releasing predators that have proven to want to kill chickens only takes the problem and unfairly puts it in someone else's neighborhood. What is right about that?
All of this put aside, many people who are members of BYC and who have chronic predator problems might do better to upgrade their coops and runs, or to keep their flocks confined. In most cases that would prove to cut losses. It costs money up front though. If free-ranging, then flock losses must be expected.
I lost 4 layers over 4 years, all to hawks. (No land predator ever breached my run.) I installed netting. Problem solved. If I see evidence of a predator attempting to dig their way under the concrete base of my run, I will set a trap, and I will not release the thing somewhere else. Does that prove I hate it, or does that show that I realize that it is not right for me to dump a chicken killer in someone else's neighborhood?
Gerry
Being concerned about whether one sets a trap to protect his flock with hate in their heart or simply does it because it is economically more sound to protect an investment than to let a predator destroy that investment is a waste of what might be time that could be better spent elsewhere.
No matter what we say on here, some people will always hate predators and others will not. It will have Zero effect on the world either way. Catching and releasing predators that have proven to want to kill chickens only takes the problem and unfairly puts it in someone else's neighborhood. What is right about that?
All of this put aside, many people who are members of BYC and who have chronic predator problems might do better to upgrade their coops and runs, or to keep their flocks confined. In most cases that would prove to cut losses. It costs money up front though. If free-ranging, then flock losses must be expected.
I lost 4 layers over 4 years, all to hawks. (No land predator ever breached my run.) I installed netting. Problem solved. If I see evidence of a predator attempting to dig their way under the concrete base of my run, I will set a trap, and I will not release the thing somewhere else. Does that prove I hate it, or does that show that I realize that it is not right for me to dump a chicken killer in someone else's neighborhood?
Gerry