All the recycled egg shells are roasted at 275 F. to kill any pathogens that may be present... don't want to continually re infect the birds...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a whole lot of Ca in grass (and vegetable scraps), and at least free range chickens have produced good shells long before the commercialization of oyster shells.
There is a whole lot of Ca in grass (and vegetable scraps), and at least free range chickens have produced good shells long before the commercialization of oyster shells.
If I understand correctly, both eggshells and oyster shells are the same form of calcium, which is calcium carbonate (CaCO3).
So there should not be significant difference in absorption.
Semantics. There's no such thing as soluble grit. Grit is insoluble for the very reason that it doesn't dissolve in the digestive tract and stays in the gizzard to aid in grinding feedstuffs. That must be in the form of granite, flint or some other insoluble stone.The larger pieces of oyster shell acts as a soluble grit in the gizzard, staying there longer, slowly dissolving, as opposed to being passed quickly.
It's ok to feed. I just make sure they can't make the connection from feed eggshells to their own eggs....
1) Is it okay to feed just their eggshells, or do I also need to add oyster shell to the mix?
2) On that note, will they every need an oyster shell supplement? I guess I was wondering if eventually the "cycle" of calcium would get weak and they would need calcium from an outside source. These eggshells will have lots of calcium since they've been eating oyster shell, but if they only eat eggshells, will each egg have less calcium in it since it's being cycled through the chicken? Does that make sense?
I may be off base and over-worrying, but I figured I'd find out for sure instead of doing something totally wrong and stupid.
Thanks.
X2A lot depends on what you are feeding them to start with. Are they getting "layer feed"? or something else? Layer feed has a generous amount of calcium, and is designed to be a complete feed. If they get that, in theory, they don't need oyster or egg shells. Though, it's not a bad idea to provide either item free choice. If they are not getting layer feed as their primary feed (making up at least 90% of their diet) they will definitely need the calcium supplement. Over the full egg laying cycle, you may find that your chooks egg shells are not as strong as they were when they first started laying. That's why chickens naturally take a break from egg laying, to build their calcium reserves. By providing calcium on the side, no matter what the source, you're allowing your girls to self regulate.
Good points, but if they're getting calcium, the source doesn't really matter unless it's dolomitic limestone which contains too much magnesium.If I understand correctly, both eggshells and oyster shells are the same form of calcium, which is calcium carbonate (CaCO3).
So there should not be significant difference in absorption.
But since the chickens will also require calcium for their bones and other bodily functions, their calcium will be steadily depleted if their only calcium is their own recycled shells.
The layer feed should certainly have calcium in it, as gardener said.
In any case, it isn't a going to quickly turn into a crisis that you can't find the oyster shells...so clean and crush your eggshells and use them as you suggested. If you notice their new eggs have thinning shells, then you will know that you need to provide supplemental calcium.
The calcium absorption sites are in the small intestine but you're right in that the large particle size gets there slower. That usually puts it there at night when the birds are sleeping and the egg is likely in the shell gland.There are studies (a search here should find them quickly) that have shown that the reason oyster shell works so well is it stays in the upper digestive tract (where the most calcium absorption sites exist) longer than other calcium supplements.
I agree, your shells aren't going to turn thin overnight. And I was not stating fact, simply my observations. I think it took about 2 weeks before I noticed the thin shells when I only fed back egg shells.
Very little.There is a whole lot of Ca in grass (and vegetable scraps), and at least free range chickens have produced good shells long before the commercialization of oyster shells.
I don't worry about the pathogens. Your eggs shouldn't have any of significance to begin with. If I do give shells, I make sure they don't resemble eggs. I usually just compost them for the garden.All the recycled egg shells are roasted at 275 F. to kill any pathogens that may be present... don't want to continually re infect the birds...
I keep a small can in the bottom of my stove.
I place all used shells there.
When I next use my stove, the shells dry and "cook".
No extra energy wasted.
X2Before the commercialization of oyster shells, chickens were laying 30-50 eggs a year. They're now bred to lay 300+. Their calcium needs are drastically higher.
Nothing done with chickens 100 years ago is relevant today - they're not the same birds.
Good points as well.Grass as in the typical backyard grass has very little nutritional value and the Calcium (Ca) is quite low.
Now you might want to also keep in mind that chickens are not herbivores and do a poor job extracting some nutrients from tough fibrous plants.
Commercial oyster shells have been around for a very long time. The use as a Calcium supplement in poultry is mostly by the backyard raiser. Commercial feed Mfg. use Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) which is mined from the earth.
Semantics. There's no such thing as soluble grit. Grit is insoluble for the very reason that it doesn't dissolve in the digestive tract and stays in the gizzard to aid in grinding feedstuffs. That must be in the form of granite, flint or some other insoluble stone.