- Apr 15, 2011
- 2,957
- 179
- 261
Haha Thai!
But in seriousness, if I can see them, they are not yet deleted.
But in seriousness, if I can see them, they are not yet deleted.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We all know the saying 'all things in moderation'. Once you take a philosophy such as hers to extremes it becomes unworkable. Growing vegetables and fruit will cause harm to an insect at least. Natural fertiliser comes from kept animals. Above all, she is using animals to promote a business, that of raising money to buy land. When she has the land she will need more money. She's keeping animals while telling us that we should not. The very act of keeping animals is against her creed.
She can believe what she wants and will either succeed or fail. It doesn't matter to anyone else. The issue for us is that she lumped us in with factory farms because she cannot bring herself to accept that not all keepers of animals treat them cruelly. If she did accept that, her case would disintegrate. Extremists of any kind are self defeating if they expect to convert most of us to their views. I have never encountered an evangelical vegan before so I assume that most get on with their lives, perhaps hoping that others will follow their example.
In Catherine's case, I don't yet see an example. She is exploiting animals by selling books. The profits, if there are any, will buy land on which she will keep animals and families will be allowed to visit. She will be either a farmer or a zoo keeper. 'Sanctuary' is a red herring.