- Thread starter
- #20,711
I've always been an idealist. It's a big problem for me.
I think we have focused on different things too. I don't often see papers like this. By the time I'm reading this stuff it's become a book & very well notated so I can source everything referenced & cross check everything. My library is exceptional this way.
While I've been accused of being an idealist I don't think I am, so when I read stuff like this I tend to see it as unrealistic & starting from a false premise ~ That ethnicity & place don't matter. We are all cosmopolitans. I would challenge this based on language alone because language reflects how we think & how we think is formed by language. In Gaelic the male/female gender allocations are a little weird @ times ~ maybe I shouldn't go there...
The neuter gender has been lost. English is very different to say nothing of the click~click languages of Africa or Hungarian or the number of words Eskimos have to describe snow! All of which reflects priorities in culture & is massively important when you think about ethnicity & what it means to identify with a certain culture. Sorry if I'm a bit disjointed. I have the kiddies & am trying to keep up in between cries of Morai!
Oh goody! Someone who understands why I might find Herodotus questionable. 

