I realize that some people might not have true Seramas, do try to cheat people and its wrong of them to lie just for the money. I definitely applaud each of the breeders trying to improve on the breeds.
But I have a question about the statement 'A serama is a living work of art. Anything less than that and you just have a bantam chicken'. I have watched a lot of the Serama breeders sell their culls on here. Most of which have faults, so they are not kept for breeding...too long in the back, wings not quite right, a little large, etc. They don't charge as high of prices for these birds as they do their more 'perfect' stock, of course. But how come the breeders of those birds still considered them Seramas, but the ones we have that aren't perfect either are merely bantams?
Many people selling their Seramas on here, have bought eggs, culls or what they could afford from respected breeders and then sell their own chicks. Resulting in many of us not getting those perfect, chesty, tiny 'works of art'. While I am sure everyone would love to have the most perfect Seramas in the world, is it fair to make us feel bad for not having them? Or to say we don't have Seramas at all?
I think that is where BYC is having a problem and why you are being kept from correcting people. While it is great to educate people, there is a wrong and right way to do it. Making others feel bad just so you can feel better about what you have, is not the correct way. I'm really not trying to get on anyones bad side here, but you have to stop and see things from other points of view.
That being said...I love so many of the Seramas I have seen on the 'real' breeders websites here and would give anything to have any of them. But I also love the little imperfect Seramas I own and they are still Seramas. Just like my huge Golden Retriever was every bit a Golden Retriever, even though I bought him from a Menonite family for $300 and didn't pay $2000 for him from an AKC breeder w/ papers.