Lagerdogger wrote:
ivan3 wrote:
I'd guess male from the distinct development of the caruncles.
I thought the distinct lack of caruncles made it look like a hen (plus the tiny snood). The lack of feathering on the back of the head makes me wonder, but I would still guess hen.
About beards, Ivan3 said they couldn't see beards until 11 months. Most of my toms beards are clearly visible by 5 months. Most of my turkeys are Royal Palm or Narragansett. Now that I think about it, my Bourbon Reds toms beard is not visible at 6 1/2 months. But you should be able to feel the beard, even if you can't see it.
The second shot posted by Resthaven was hennish/the first was ambiguous (to me, at least).
I think there is considerable variation in between varieties and those variations are amplified within particular lines (beard growth for instance). Here are ours in late Feb. `06 (hatched the 3rd of June '05) (9 months). The beards are just nubs. The Slates actually protuded enough so that you could see them when they weren't displaying at 11months the Royal at 10.
Here they are at at 4 months. The male's heads have a more vulturine appearance.
All three of our males were obviously so while still in the brooder, they all three strutted and butted chests, the females did not. The females always used the roosts, the males slept in the bedding:
Our only poult that hatched out this year was pretty easy to sex (knew for sure at a little over a month - behavior and shape of head).
https://www.backyardchickens.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=386328
But that is just `informed speculation.' The crowing hen reminds me of my limitations...