It's an interesting article and a subject that really questions me, without having reached a personal answer I would find totally satisfying.This article caught my eye today.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeand...-pets-is-it-time-to-give-up-our-cats-and-dogs
One of the chicken rescue I follow on IG because I love how she tells the individual story of all the chickens, Lefty’s place, urges her followers not only to stop buying chicks, but to stop breeding chickens.
About cats and dogs, which are the subject of the article, one big thing that troubles me is that it's obviously a class issue. Sure, there can be individual exceptions, but overall it's going to be a lot more easy to provide the right environment when you have money, a big house and live in the countryside than when you are a bum in the city. Exaggerating, but you get my point. Claiming only people with a suitable environment should have pets may mean they would be mostly restricted to rich people.
Then of course the confort that can be had caring for animals, can be obtained by other means than owning them, as you very well show.
And also, I keep wondering what would they do without us ? Not only the pets, but all the livestock ? Have we changed them so much that they would be unable to survive ? In fact, I should say what will they do without us, because at the rate it's going, we won't be around for long anymore.
It hasn't been the case for us but our situation is specific. One notable fact is that we don't pay for water. At equal quality, things like tomatoes, potatoes, or butternut squashes are really cheaper for us to grow than to buy, and they compensate for the rest.Home-grown produce usually works out more expensive in my experience - and that's without factoring in my time - and weather or pests may lead to a big or even total loss.
But if we had had the boar issue at the beginning of summer instead of now I might not have said the same thing

Tax : Petit Blanc cleaning up after we picked the onions.