- Thread starter
- #11
No. Rude and false are both highly subjective feelings based on who is reading it. Some people even interpret science as falseCan a rude or false one be added too?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Rude and false are both highly subjective feelings based on who is reading it. Some people even interpret science as falseCan a rude or false one be added too?
The latter part of this message confuses me. Likes are search filters in threadloom.I like reactions and likes, kind of like iMessage. I love having likes, and I don’t even look at peoples likes count. But I enjoy having likes here, and if we remove likes please keep in mind we remove many filters while looking for a message or thread.
That's why I also suggested changeTo be blunt, I think it's quite unlikely that we'd eliminate likes. I do think they can be improved with reactions, though.
Who cares what someone else posts for. Don't let that bother you.My biggest problem is that likes are a huge motivator for a post count that isn't educational or helpful. I'm sure there are some people who only post for likes.
Sounds good. Any chance there can be a tab in the members section for 'most informative reactions'? (Maybe phrased differently.I think we'll probably create some custom reactions, like maybe "Useful", "Informative", etc. when we upgrade.
There will be a reaction score that will replace the likes count, and it will either go up, or stay the same based on the reaction. We could set it so certain reactions have a negative reaction score, but like I said, we probably wouldn't do that. By default, it doesn't show what number of specific reactions a user has received, but there might be an add-on for that.Sounds good. Any chance there can be a tab in the members section for 'most informative reactions'? (Maybe phrased differently.