Quote: Opal is a problem as a name in that it is already being used by OEGB for a variety that I think has already been either approved or had at least one qualifying meet. And they are not the same phenotype or genotype as the silkie "porcelains."
So do you have a variety name recommendation???
I truly don't care. Would just like to have a label I can apply ....
Before we name it, how about we have ONE working standard to work with. The "porcelains" I see mentioned are all over the board on phenotype. IMO, GM is the one who should determine what the working standard should be as he is the creator of the variety in silkies. By the same token, he should name it.
I would be
more than happy to follow GM's lead .... (his name was mentioned by the judge at the Canadian Nationals)