Can you find the link or post a discussion about it? I'd love to see it. This is what I was talking about earlier-- so far everything I have read or heard from others is that blacks from blues is not the greatest idea on creating the best blacks. But if it can be sucessfully done... I'm just wondering how. I have that blue bird that is always mistaken for black, she is VERY dark. In person, she gleams like a black bird-- you saw the picture I posted and could see the light bouncing off her "black" feathers. But with the blue underfluff AND the fact she throws splash, she is indeed a blue, no doubt about it. But thinking a blue like her with another dark blue cockerel... maybe could produce blacks that would melanize all the way down...? Or is that a waste of time and stick with hunting down black X black birds.This summer, I asked folks on The Coop to help me understand the genetics of black silkies, and how to get true black silkies in a breeding program. The general response was to "never" use a black that comes from blue stock or blue origins. I can post the link to that conversation if anyone is interested. There was some indepth genetic discussion, which I had some difficulty interpreting. Maybe someone here can decipher? At that time I did not query about blue underfluff, and yesterday I went back to The Coop with a follow up question.
Great question! And if the blacks that have the lighter underfluff---- are they really just a dark blue??? Would they really be a black at all?? Does black HAVE to have the black all the way down? Because, I know with my own blue-- in every way, she looks black, except for the lighter under fluff. And her under fluff is really not that light, at all! But having bred her, I know for a fact she is a dark blue and not black.Does that indicate that the blue gene percentages are out the window or that all the blacks are really blue or that the blacks are just poor quality blacks?
So it could be possible to get a decent black from blue X blue if the birds being used were very dark?Okay, by variety name he is a grey. By genetic composition he is silver. A golden (one copy silver, 1 copy gold) has creamier to light yellowish hackles, etc.
A black from blue to blue breeding could be a very good black; it depends on the melanizers present. Lighter blues tend to have less melanization in hte plumage, but blue is such a variable colour that I am not sure there is a simple "always works this way" answer.
I have one of those birds (actually a cockerel, too) that are so dark blue, they look black. Would this be the ideal set up for trying for black? I'm saying, more ideal than two lighter blues.Blue is a dilution gene; it dilutes the amount of black in the feather. It is also highly variable. While the percentages are correct from a genetic discussion, it ignores that some blues are so dark that they appear black. Additional melanizers can add black back into the feathers.
There are a number of discussions about blues at The Coop. It is a highly variable gene as far as the amount of penetrance goes.
My blues are Gold based, too. What base color makes the best black, or does it really matter?