Quote:
Well in some sense the tax is just pay back for the subsidies. It would be more efficient just to stop subsidizing the high fructose corn syrup, the price would rise to reflect the fair cost. But we can't have that. Iowa has the first primary and it would be disaster to a politician's career to vote against subsidizing corn.
I do think the school system bears some of the blame for the increased obesity. Schools are cutting back on the amount of time students are allowed to exercise or play. They have to spend more time studying for standardized tests and only get an hour or two per week for P.E. It's not just the caloric intake- its the caloric balance.
Also here they have forced advertising. Every day kids are forced to watch commercials at school so the schools can get free AV equipment. When schools force impressionable children to watch junk food comercials and make them "sit still" instead of being active, the parents have a large burden counteract.
Well in some sense the tax is just pay back for the subsidies. It would be more efficient just to stop subsidizing the high fructose corn syrup, the price would rise to reflect the fair cost. But we can't have that. Iowa has the first primary and it would be disaster to a politician's career to vote against subsidizing corn.
I do think the school system bears some of the blame for the increased obesity. Schools are cutting back on the amount of time students are allowed to exercise or play. They have to spend more time studying for standardized tests and only get an hour or two per week for P.E. It's not just the caloric intake- its the caloric balance.
Also here they have forced advertising. Every day kids are forced to watch commercials at school so the schools can get free AV equipment. When schools force impressionable children to watch junk food comercials and make them "sit still" instead of being active, the parents have a large burden counteract.