In general the idea of breeders 'culling' their 'stock' that don't have the traits they desire is horrific. I thought that is what was meant by the OP in that many people are so concerned with their seramas having to look a certain way, which is not even feasible in the example of single colours, that they are willing to slaughter many seramas that don't fulfil the unreasonable criteria of 'perfection'. Selectively breeding birds with the desired characteristics does not necessitate, or justify, slaughtering those without.
It's not horrific to me. I don't breed seramas, but I do breed large fowl Chanteclers. The substandard ones are a food source. The closer to standard ones are bred to produce more for eggs and meat. It's simply a different way of choosing which ones you eat---intentional selection towards uniformity and health, vs buying one batch of a specific breed and slaughtering them all.


I'm not trying to be antagonistic here, I'm trying to present my own opinion and learn more about why you think eating birds by a different set of criteria is wrong.
OP: Like Moonshiner said---if you don't like standardized varieties, don't breed for 'em. I'm not a Serama person so I don't know if it's actually changing the breed like I think you're claiming. If I'm wrong about that, correct me! I personally like the general idea. It adds another aspect to a challenging and enjoyable hobby, and the standard is there for those that want it.
Last edited: