- Thread starter
- #2,511
Notice that Athena's barring is becoming more distinct as she feathers in more-I've seen that in most of the pullets here. On the other hand, I don't care for how the barring across the chests of the males sort of blurs out. I doubt it will sharpen up over time. I just hope they are an improvement over Atlas's barring, being more on the BR side than their sire is, so that the Stukel blood is "doubled down". But, the pullets should be at least as good as Tessa and Lizzie.
I have these because I had two simultaneous broodies but I wonder if they will be good enough to keep any of them. Been an irritating day so forgive my mood. Someone got snippy with me on a group because, after a case came out like I was sure it would, I said they should not jump to the Mareks conclusion every time a bird went down; this was in regard to a cockerel who suddenly was on his side and no use of his legs, just overnight, no other birds affected. I thought it was an injury, maybe he flew into a wall or was hit on the back of the neck like Deacon was, did not present at all to me like Mareks. Told the owner what to do and that she would decide, if he did not recover, whether to cull him or what her next course of action was. So, she did and did a great job of it. Very rational woman. And after two or three weeks of supportive therapy, that cockerel is on his feet this morning, yea! BUT, some person called me out, saying this is FB, not a vet. Well, lady, folks treat it like it is, just like they do BYC and everyone who may have read or heard even one fact about Marek's immediately goes to that conclusion, regardless of the details of the case. I was just saying you have to be a detective, not jump to worst case scenario. But, that apparently did not sit well with some. Always amazes me when someone who literally knows nothing offers their "expert" diagnosis and the poor owner is worried unnecessarily. I mean, how many thousands, maybe even millions of these "what's wrong with my bird?" stories have I been through here? Good grief.


I do like his wide stance.

I have these because I had two simultaneous broodies but I wonder if they will be good enough to keep any of them. Been an irritating day so forgive my mood. Someone got snippy with me on a group because, after a case came out like I was sure it would, I said they should not jump to the Mareks conclusion every time a bird went down; this was in regard to a cockerel who suddenly was on his side and no use of his legs, just overnight, no other birds affected. I thought it was an injury, maybe he flew into a wall or was hit on the back of the neck like Deacon was, did not present at all to me like Mareks. Told the owner what to do and that she would decide, if he did not recover, whether to cull him or what her next course of action was. So, she did and did a great job of it. Very rational woman. And after two or three weeks of supportive therapy, that cockerel is on his feet this morning, yea! BUT, some person called me out, saying this is FB, not a vet. Well, lady, folks treat it like it is, just like they do BYC and everyone who may have read or heard even one fact about Marek's immediately goes to that conclusion, regardless of the details of the case. I was just saying you have to be a detective, not jump to worst case scenario. But, that apparently did not sit well with some. Always amazes me when someone who literally knows nothing offers their "expert" diagnosis and the poor owner is worried unnecessarily. I mean, how many thousands, maybe even millions of these "what's wrong with my bird?" stories have I been through here? Good grief.
I do like his wide stance.
Last edited: