Mohawk.
I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but the term "mohawk" was just a name Bob Blosl gave to a particular feathering type in one of his lines. Bob had other colorful "names" for feathering quality he saw in other of his birds. The term was useful and had meaning to Bob, but it has become far too over blown by folks these days.
There are many suberb quality Reds around and certain "lines" worked on hard and long by others as well. These names are sometimes abused by those who are marketing and hyping their birds. The buyer would be well advised to pay far less attention to such things and learn the Standard, clerk for a top Red's judge at some shows and be mentored by someone who can help them see good type, shape, combs, feather, keels, back lines, etc in Reds.
Relying on jargon or hype is not a good method. A pen of birds can have all the supposed "names" in the world proclaimed over them and yet? Shockingly, perhaps, if one may not understand breeding, there's not a single bird of quality in that pen. Not a one. Every last one of them could be little more than potential soup stock for dumplings.
Mrs Donald Donaldson and the rather famous Reese line of Reds is a good line. But, what one has in a backyard pens is entirely up to you and your abiities to select and breed good birds. We don't breed names. We breed birds. It takes a lot of experience, trial and error, time, more time, more feed, more matings, more hatchings, more culling than you might ever imagine to produce a decent bird here or there.
OK, that's my $.02 for this morning. I've got some outstanding Red birds to go take care of. I asked them yesterday if they knew anything about Mohawk and not a single bird answered me. All they wanted was their fresh water and feed bowl refilled. hmmmmm...