Nothing wrong with giving information as to the foundations of our birds. My only concern is the impression that is sometimes left in the minds of folks that 5 −8 generations later, these birds are still what the original keeper of that line had in mind. That question can only be answered by judging the birds against the Standard.
These birds, just because they have history, a name and or some heritage do not stay "put together" by themselves and not immune to decline and disarray. A couple of bad matings and failure to hatch adequate numbers and/or cull properly and any breed, strain or "line" can slide into the sewer pretty quickly.
A Mr Reese, or Mr Nelson or Mr Meyers may have put together some great birds back then, but they're in our hands now. I'm reading, studying, asking, learning, observing and working hard at trying to comprehend it and put together good birds from the DNA I've inherited.