That doesn't link straight to the proposed wording of the amendment, but I have to say, the way many US laws are named, I wouldn't be surprised if that was something that defines a farm as a ridiculously huge piece of property, making it virtually impossible for small scale farmers to continue with their farming. It's interesting how you can make people think a certain way by just naming a law right. West wing and House of Cards have a lot of interesting fictional examples.We have a new amendment to our state constitution on the ballot tomorrow. I'm wary of it. The title is 'Right to Farm'. The wording is so vague, any conflicts that arise will have to be worked out in court. Corporations have the money for that. Monsanto and out of state interests are big backers. I'm leaning no. The basis of the amendment is already law so why a constitutional amendment?
http://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Right-to-Farm,_Amendment_1_(August_2014)
You wouldn't believe the ads being run on both sides.