So what ya think now Birdrain? all say hens so far.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow... the whole post and all the comments directly via Facebook.
Yes yes yes!! Makes things 100% times easier than writing every word out.Got to love copy and paste!
-Kathy
That is some good info. -KathyHere's the ongoing conversation. Of course you know that Christopher is one of out valued contributors here!
- Christopher Gordon Another point of contention -- if they are full siblings, and both parents were IB Pied, then Calypso should have some white feathering. Pied X Pied = 25% Dark Pied, 50% Pied, 25% White. Calypso does not appear to be either of those, while Thor(a) appears to be Dark Pied. If, as is common among peafowl breeders who don't fully understand basic genetics, inaccurate terminology was used to describe the parents' phenotypes and they weren't "true Pied" but were instead, perhaps, Dark Pied, split to Pied, or split to White (either both parents or just one), then chances are you'd still most likely have all their offspring being marked in some degree with white -- even if just a little under the beak or a wing feather or two. Does Calypso display any of that? If not, that's more evidence that the birds are NOT full siblings, which is also more evidence that the seller either doesn't know much about the birds sold to you or was mistaken. In any case, "because I said so" is not enough to make something true if evidence suggests otherwise.
[COLOR=808080]about an hour ago ·[/COLOR]
- [FLOAT=RIGHT] [/FLOAT]
Christina Bishop Aqua thora is not a dark pied look at all the white she has, i agree with you on Calypso being a spalding and she does have more white you just can't see it she looks like a dark pied IMO
[COLOR=808080]about an hour ago[/COLOR]
Just posted it on facebook.