What Came First?

[m.kitchengirl]

I brought home 6 chickens in May & didn't start getting eggs until late October.
So, I have decided the chicken came first.

 

[rodriguezpoultry]

The chickens.

You gotta have two to Tango and without fertilization, no chick would hatch from the aforementioned egg to continue to produce more eggs.

 

[chickened]

An egg comes from a chicken that we can prove but the first chicken who really knows... God. The first egg needs to be hatched in the the natural order of things. Creation is a miracle unto itself therefore defying natural occurances so it very well may be one of those questions where you must rely on faith... kind of like taking a check from someone to the bank for redemption.

 

[dfr1973]

Every time I see this question, I remember an adult-humor comic pane with the caption "Well, I guess we finally answered THAT question!"

 

[Henny peeny]

I had been on the history channel and they said it was dinosuars that laid the eggs and the bird have dinosaur DNA in them STILL so I think it was the egg of course if you think it this way you have to have a egg to have a chicken but then you need to have a chicken to have a egg but then agian if there was not egg there is no chicken and if no chicken no egg so if you didn't have either where in the world would a chicken come from Ok so maybe it would evolve from something else maybe a lizard or Some thing that lays eggs other them a dinosuar.

OK I am not very smart but just in thought. I know dinosuars woere big lizards right but what if there were no dinosaurs the where could then evoled from.

I hope this is not lock I find this very interseting.

Rhayden

 

[simplynewt]

Interesting Thoughts

 

[redhen]

The chicken...
They evolved from dinos... which evolved from..etc..etc..etc..

 

[EmtheFishLady]

Quote:

Em has seen the comic you are referring to.

 

[DTchickens]

Quote:
They share DNA with dinosaurs, whether it is actual "Dino DNA" or not though depends on who you ask most likely. Humans and Chimps share 95% of the same DNA (most people say 98, but this decreased with new studies), and I believe somewhere around 83% of DNA with rats. This information can be read in many different ways I am sure, as for evolution vs creationism this topic would probably be best to steer clear of.

I have debated many times on the topic of evolution and creationism, I hold to the belief of a God and creation even after all of the things I have looked over scientifically and speaking with some rather knowledgeable atheists. But neither side can offer proof to back up their point really, macro-evolution lacks scientific data (there are many claims but all can be dis-proven or at least deemed unreliable. Micro-evolution and macro-evolution are not the same.) and creationism lacks scientific data to prove there is a God. It's mainly a subject you have to decide your own belief on.

 

[yinepu]

*looks at my signature*
the velociraptors