I consider myself to be a pretty progressive modern woman... after all, my husband and I are rock n roll photographers out of NYC, not exactly bible belt material. I also completely understand and agree with what Chicks & Horses is saying. She has found contentment and happiness living in harmony with her life-mate. If there is mutual love, respect, and concern for the happiness of BOTH partners, then compromise will be painless. Like I said before, if one partner has a reasonable and thoughtful request for something to be so or not be so, then the other should be thoughtful and reasonable enough to honor it. The color red makes me cringe, so we're not painting our walls red like my husband would like. He hates onions, so I don't cook with them. Neither decision is killing either of us.
I think we're forgetting that this thread started about a woman wanting yet another chicken to add to a flock her husband already doesn't want. What's so unreasonable about him not endlessly compromising his comfort for her hobby, which undoubtedly affects the whole family because it's part of their home.
This isn't about one person being the boss over the other. And I think that attacking Chicks & Horses about saying her husband having final say is short-sighted and lacking compassion. It works for them. I'm college educated, world traveled, career woman and mother of three who has definitive and outlined roles within my marriage in order to make it work for US. We respect each other and share responsibilities, but have different jobs and roles. Sometimes I have final say, because I'm an expert on something he isn't, and vice versa.
Regardless of how anyone chooses to take care of their marriage, I think its always a bad idea to take as divisive a stance as "I'll do want I want because I can." To me, that's underhanded and insults the integrity of the idea of sharing a single life together. I gave up no dream to be married, but I have changed and made compromises for a relationship and family that brings me more joy than I thought existed.
The opposite of selfishness is compassion... not pity, but really feeling what the other feels and gaining understanding of their plight. Without compassion there is no love, and you're just housemates-not husband and wife.
I think we're forgetting that this thread started about a woman wanting yet another chicken to add to a flock her husband already doesn't want. What's so unreasonable about him not endlessly compromising his comfort for her hobby, which undoubtedly affects the whole family because it's part of their home.
This isn't about one person being the boss over the other. And I think that attacking Chicks & Horses about saying her husband having final say is short-sighted and lacking compassion. It works for them. I'm college educated, world traveled, career woman and mother of three who has definitive and outlined roles within my marriage in order to make it work for US. We respect each other and share responsibilities, but have different jobs and roles. Sometimes I have final say, because I'm an expert on something he isn't, and vice versa.
Regardless of how anyone chooses to take care of their marriage, I think its always a bad idea to take as divisive a stance as "I'll do want I want because I can." To me, that's underhanded and insults the integrity of the idea of sharing a single life together. I gave up no dream to be married, but I have changed and made compromises for a relationship and family that brings me more joy than I thought existed.
The opposite of selfishness is compassion... not pity, but really feeling what the other feels and gaining understanding of their plight. Without compassion there is no love, and you're just housemates-not husband and wife.
Last edited: