- Thread starter
- #21
- Oct 13, 2012
- 35
- 0
- 22
Sorry should have noted that No Name was born Oct. 18th puchased Oct. 20 and and these pics were taken Oct. 28th. Dumb Dumb was born around Sept. 26th and purchased on Sept. 28th so after my original posting when I though he was a he and not a she, I bought No Name from the next available batch. (Unfortunatly I had a different one bought on Oct. 19th extrememly dark legs all the way to the start of her toes and one perfect round little circle of white on her head, She did not survive the night just way to small even my older 4 did not take to her that day.) (so i went back and picked out the next darkest one that I could find who was very lively No Name), but I already see differences from when dumb dumb was that small, no tail till just this week and No Name had one pretty much from the start. So Heres for hoping. Fingers crossed.
No name is a she. Other wise I am having very bad luck with BR's They are one of my favorite in looks. And so far very sweet even if a boy.
No name is a she. Other wise I am having very bad luck with BR's They are one of my favorite in looks. And so far very sweet even if a boy.

The more I look at my either she is a ((