I believe the German person cannot see your comments anymore as they are ignoring you, which I will do as well, and I suggest others follow suit.Although I wrote that I will not write anymore, I will try to answer you, just because you seem reasonable and cultured!
I really don't know which question I didn't answer, I actually gave you a "like" because I agree with you!
Big predators, wolves, bears, mountain lions... there is really little you can do, because they will tear your fence and endanger you and your animals, in that case you can shoot because your life is in danger - the state will pay you the damages!
Smaller predators, foxes, weasels, lynxes... there are effective ways of defense against them and they cannot easily tear the fence (unless it is cheap and of poor quality), there is no reason for them to kill themselves!
More clearly now, how does the law work?
History tells us that people simply torture animals by keeping them in inadequate conditions, small spaces, dirty spaces, unprotected spaces...
If we keep animals in dirty places and directly endanger them with diseases - do you think that this is bad keeping of animals?
If you agree with that, then what is the difference in the fact that you endanger unprotected animals with wild predators?
Dirty habitat and unprotected habitat - it's the same to me!
I'm not so stupid that I judge all Americans based on a few comments on the forum, but look at the comments:
- I find foxes creepy, nice aim!
-Thankfully I don't live in Europe, and have plenty of ammo
-The next few predators I kill, I do so in your honor....
- It depends on what they taste like smoked low and slow.
- Oh, Mr Fox was eliminated last night in your honor. My livestock, thank you for your support.
- I don't need a LGD. I just shoot the predators.
These are the messages of the civilized world?
And what about the German whom I wrote that he is a liar and who has not yet replied to my message why is he lying when he knows that the same law is implemented in Germany!
Why is he obviously lying? Maybe he wants to preserve his good reputation on the forum by lying to you Americans?
I laugh when I read the comments that the fox should have been killed because it was sick anyway, I wonder if they first took it to a laboratory test to confirm its illness, and only then killed it?
Total nonsense!
So you will watch a fox killing your chickens if you catch it in the act. I think that is very sad. I don't want compensation from the state. I want my flock alive and well. My birds mean more to me than a few dollars. Fortunately, my animals have not yet been attacked by any predators.
I don't find it particularly cultured or reasonable of you to be so judgmental of a culture you clearly know very little about.
And as for being civilized - killing a few foxes is not wiping out an entire species. I don't kill anything. I just prefer to let folks live their own lives. Most Americans do, too, as we - as a collective - value freedom.
Do you what is truly uncivilized? Ethnic cleansing. That to me is primitive.
Last edited: