- Thread starter
- #11
UPDATE: There was no snow on the ground when the attack occurred but conveniently it began snowing yesterday evening and continues today. I went out this morning and found clear tracks coming from the woods, walking directly to where we found the carcass, hiding under the nearby pine tree (2 ft away), and then moving on. The snow obscures the shape of the track---but I could see approximate size and spacing between. I would guess, based on what I could see, that it is either raccoon or fox or very big skunk. (Too small for coyote, too big for possum, same shape to all four feet unlike rabbit, no tail-dragging marks between tracks.)
Also, last night after full dark my dogs began barking the intruder bark and, when let outside, were looking in the place where I found the tracks today.
So, of course it is possible whatever left the tracks is a different animal than what killed the hen, but the tracks walked right there, and clearly they were left after a good 2 inches of snowfall would have obscured the scent, and we'd long since removed the carcass. If this was a human we'd say it had obviously returned to the scene of the crime! But, I am no expert on animal behavior and there could be many reasons this animal happened to be walking there--maybe stopping under the pine tree is a regular part of its nightly prowl, for example.
Therefore, I appeal to those who are wild animal behavior experts! Are the presence of these tracks helpful clues or meaningless?
Also, what about the almost surgical nature of the wounds. Only two small breast feathers lost, every other feather was intact. Is it true that some animals are more likely to tear at the carcass (e.g. fox or bird of prey) or am I misinformed?
Also, if it helps as to the question of whether a coon could have been fast enough to catch this bird...I love my ISA Browns for their eggs but they aren't clever and this particular bird was known to freeze and squat helplessly at any sign of danger. She was found right next to the pine tree the coon could have been hiding under to launch the attack.
Also, last night after full dark my dogs began barking the intruder bark and, when let outside, were looking in the place where I found the tracks today.
So, of course it is possible whatever left the tracks is a different animal than what killed the hen, but the tracks walked right there, and clearly they were left after a good 2 inches of snowfall would have obscured the scent, and we'd long since removed the carcass. If this was a human we'd say it had obviously returned to the scene of the crime! But, I am no expert on animal behavior and there could be many reasons this animal happened to be walking there--maybe stopping under the pine tree is a regular part of its nightly prowl, for example.
Therefore, I appeal to those who are wild animal behavior experts! Are the presence of these tracks helpful clues or meaningless?
Also, what about the almost surgical nature of the wounds. Only two small breast feathers lost, every other feather was intact. Is it true that some animals are more likely to tear at the carcass (e.g. fox or bird of prey) or am I misinformed?
Also, if it helps as to the question of whether a coon could have been fast enough to catch this bird...I love my ISA Browns for their eggs but they aren't clever and this particular bird was known to freeze and squat helplessly at any sign of danger. She was found right next to the pine tree the coon could have been hiding under to launch the attack.