Exactly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok then - since I have been ingesting every single dry, terribly boring YouTube video and research paper I can on chicken genetics. - question I have been curious about since Nat is here too.This chick is black. For future reference, Mottled Brahmas are extremely rare in the US. I only know of one or two breeders from a facebook group. On the contrary, there are many more black/blue breeders but they're still quite rare. Black Brahmas have much larger amounts of white on them compared to other black breeds because their standard calls for yellow shanks and there is correlation between black enhancers and darker shanks. This leads to a more steely grey color. I had the same question with my Black Brahmas. Here's my thread from a few years ago.
If you start with a mottled chicken, and a Brahma, you could eventually create a mottled Brahma. Starting with a black Brahma would make it go faster than starting with any other color of Brahma.If you wanted to "create" a mottled Brahma for breeding stock, would it be possible without starting with a mottled brahma?
Basically yes.Obvious to show mottling, a chick would need to be a homozygote carrier - and I know the gene is recessive.
But, if I had a Mottled Java rooster for instance, and bred him with a light Brahma, all chicks will carry a single mottling gene. Then, if I have a reverse paring gender wise, and breed them, some chicks would carry two copies, and some would only have a single.
Question - could I then just continue this pattern until an end up with a cockerel and pullet with the desired appearance, and both obviously mottle homozygotes? I know there are other like feathered feet that would also need to fall into place.
I don't see why there would be any brown in the picture, if it started with blue layers and Leghorns who lay white. You could do the whole project without any of the genes that make a brown coating on the outside of the shell. So no brown eggs, no green eggs, just blue and white (not-blue).My curiosity mainly comes from the CC Legbar - because when it comes to it, it is probably the greatest chicken creation. Not only is the blue egg with no alleles true, but also the autosexing. Logic says that in attempting to create a breed like this, breeding brown allele carriers with homozygote blue egg layers (which is how it started) you will end up with 100% green egg layers. But how would you get the brown allele out?!
It depends on which of the 1000 stories you believe on how the CCL came to be. Each time I clicked a link, someone seemed to say the breed started and was developed entirely different than the last!I don't see why there would be any brown in the picture
This is exactly what I thought. And like you said, you can only test with females. But then there are the males...After that, it's just a matter of test-mating
To test that: mate the male to a non-blue-egg female, hatch a bunch of chicks, raise all the daughters, see what color eggs they lay. If even one daughter lays not-blue, you know the male has the not-blue-egg gene. If you have large numbers of daughters, and every single one lays blue eggs, the male is homozygous for the blue egg gene. It takes about 6-7 daughters laying blue eggs to be 90-something percent sure their father is homozygous for the blue egg gene, and more daughters will make you even more sure.How in the world would you actually know if the males are really homozygous for the blue egg gene. I kept thinking if they hatched from a blue egg, then that means they are - but that don't seem right. I lost that train of thought.
Do you know if this something readily available to backyard enthusiasts?A genetic test was recently developed, to test for the blue egg gene.
Yes, it is pretty easy to do.Do you know if this something readily available to backyard enthusiasts?