Why do people re-open ancient threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've noticed a few times that someone has responded to a thread that is quite old. However, I generally have an interest in the topic - or I wouldn't have clicked on the link to the thread. I see no problem with it at all. I've probably done it myself without realizing it.
 
I have to agree with the "no problems with it" folks.
I understand that often the OP has their answer, no longer cares, or has gone inactive by the time someone ressurects a post, but if there was an expiration date, I would think that the staff would go through and lock or delete old threads. If the staff hasn't locked it, it seems to me that it doesn't hurt anything for new posts to be added.
I found this forum through internet searches when I NEEDED information, and while I'm computer/internet savy enough to check how old a thread is, maybe my neighbor is not so techno-oriented. And if someone needs a clarification on some good info that was posted last year, I'd rather they ask in an old thread than go without the info because they are nervous about starting a new thread when they don't really know how to navigate a forum or which section to post in.

I personally resurrected an old thread with a link to a good website that tells how long stuff stays good to eat. Admittedly, I resurrected that thread without realizing how old it was. (I just didn't look). But the info is still valid and valuable, and others were soon posting in there as well, so clearly I wasn't the only one who wanted to know how long my fresh eggs would be edible if refridgerated.
 
Is this thread now officially an old post?

Rufus

gig.gif
 
I am a culprit!!
sorry, but I thought you would prefer we looked for an old thread in the 'search' rather than start a new one asking the same thing... I did it today! But I also replied to myself so you can ignore it now

apologies
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom