The screening process is a lot like obtaining a protective order in the idea is that with protective orders are given in part to keep the door open to those that need protection and the penalty for abusing the system is minor and in Oregon if you are successful in not getting a PO against you you are not entitled to attorney fees if you win and the false accusor is free to accuse someone else. In reality the food stamp program is the same way they are very relaxed to not discourage people from asking and they do not dig very deep to verify info. How do you verify nothing? if that is what you claim to have. People work under the table, manipulate the facts, purposefully work just enough to "qualify" and flat out lie until caught and then have a relative get them. You do not even need an address. I personally know folks abusing the system currently and they are very good at folling a caseworker and playing on their sympathy. Pennslvania has a whopping .01% fraud rate in the foodstamp program. Most successful fraud prosecutions are against the retailer or so I read.
Give me a break, you are providing the info for them to later varify... pulleezz
.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017911344_peabody05m.html
Give me a break, you are providing the info for them to later varify... pulleezz
.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017911344_peabody05m.html
Last edited: