I do not mean to start a "my wormer is better than your wormer" war, just a honest question here.
If it has been documented that intestinal parasites are becoming resistant to dewormers, why would everyone immediately use Valbazen (albendazole) for a potential one or two parasite infestation since broad ranged use of that will eventually result in albendazole no longer working like it currently does? Doesn't it make a bit more sense to find out what type of worms one is trying to get rid of and getting something that has a more specific target?
To me, grabbing albendazole as the first choice is a lot like using three sticks of dynamite to dig a hole that four scoops of a shovel could have done. There is the potential for extreme overkill here and faster parasite resistance buildup. Just something to ponder over.
If it has been documented that intestinal parasites are becoming resistant to dewormers, why would everyone immediately use Valbazen (albendazole) for a potential one or two parasite infestation since broad ranged use of that will eventually result in albendazole no longer working like it currently does? Doesn't it make a bit more sense to find out what type of worms one is trying to get rid of and getting something that has a more specific target?
To me, grabbing albendazole as the first choice is a lot like using three sticks of dynamite to dig a hole that four scoops of a shovel could have done. There is the potential for extreme overkill here and faster parasite resistance buildup. Just something to ponder over.
