In reference to "all the big commercial hatcheries would be using that method" please see the patent link above. Your argument comes up over and over again.
That people have pulled a patent for machinery that can intelligently and mechanically determine round vs pointed, is the express nature of the patent. The granting of the patent does nothing to grant validity to the underlying supposition or hypothesis that the shape is important at all. The patent is merely for an idea and equipment and intellectual property of the system. That is all.
There is nothing in the patent request itself that provides a stitch of evidence as to the validity of the "shape cues sex" supposition. There have been millions of patents pulled for ideas and products that never had any practical application, let alone commercial success.
As an aside, the MotherEarth article provides nothing but one person's undocumented, unsubstantiated opinion as well.
I'm still waiting to see one link to a poultry science study which lends credence to "shapes cues sex". Surely, there must be one, two or a three such journal articles published somewhere which lends support to this idea.
Last edited: