Quote: In other words, you have nothing to back up any of your claims, so you just ramble and hope no one will notice
It seems to be a pattern
It seems to be a pattern
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And where is your proof that crops that have been screwed with are safe?? You seem to think just because we are not growing 3 eyes after a short time, all is good. We can't just blindly buy certified organic, as the gov has messed that up also. Many farmers & businesses are already playing to the consumer's wish for non GMO stuff. Hopefully it will continue until it's too difficult to grow GMO. I only hope non GMO crops are not 100% contaminated by then.In other words, you have nothing to back up any of your claims, so you just ramble and hope no one will notice
It seems to be a pattern
In other words, you have nothing to back up any of your claims, so you just ramble and hope no one will notice
It seems to be a pattern
Still beating your drum despite the fact that the Saralini study was proven valid on this very forum? I suppose you will go on beating your drum on the next forum and the next, just as if what was discovered here had never happened. Perhaps you have a case of Stockholm syndrome? The truth is where it always was: Hiding in plain sight.I've already answered that first question, but once more, simply show me your proof
You say you know they are out there, so show them
You say there's a cancer study, so show it.
But I'm pretty sure it will be the same old study that's already been shown at least twice in this thread and I've shown where at least 6 different countrie's Govt food safety agencies said it was a totally worthless study
Like I said in a previous post, if you have proof, simply post it, BUT if all you have is junk science from Huber, Pusztai, or Saralini, then don't bother because those were shot down a long time ago.
No, the truth doesn't always win. Take for example the Maine, the Lusitania, the gulf of Tonkin, and "weapons of mass destruction." All lies that won. However, the gig may be up for GMO. Even the corporate-controlled NY Times admits that gmo is a failure:But don't go around spreading misinformation about how "bad" they are unless you can prove it scientifically
So far, no one has
In the end , the truth always "wins"
It makes no difference to me what anyone "wants'
I just hate seeing people spreading false information to try and justify it.
You've always had a choice. If you don't want to eat anything you think is GMO, buy Certified Organic
It's that simple, and no one really cares either way
But don't go around spreading misinformation about how "bad" they are unless you can prove it scientifically
So far, no one has
In the end , the truth always "wins"
Bear Foot Farm - You keep repeating the same falsehood, that no one has provided scientific information that GMO's are bad for us. It won't become true just by repetition.
Denying something does not make it go away. You just attack any study that does not support your belief, refusing to consider the possibility that anything you don't agree with might actually be true.
Your tag line there - "the truth always 'wins'" ? It's pretty ironic, considering how hard you are working to deny the truth with your comments.
There are lots of studies showing that there are hazards to GMO crops - you just refuse to recognize them as being valid.
It's rather like jumping off the top of the Empire State Building with great confidence that you will not fall because no one can prove how gravity works. There's truth in the statement that no one has yet been able to prove how gravity works - but that doesn't mean you won't plummet to the ground.
Another lie is trying to win out over truth and this lie is being perpetrated by the people who are opposed to GMOs.No, the truth doesn't always win. Take for example the Maine, the Lusitania, the gulf of Tonkin, and "weapons of mass destruction." All lies that won. However, the gig may be up for GMO. Even the corporate-controlled NY Times admits that gmo is a failure:
.... Conventionally bred drought resistance has raised yields around 30 percent in the last 30 years; Monsanto’s drought-resistant corn, says Gurian-Sherman, promises at most a 6 percent increase, and that only in moderate drought.... We’re using more pesticides than ever (something like 400 million pounds in the last 15 years),