Announcement 2020 Update: Political and Politically Charged Content Not Allowed

[cluckmecoop7]

Everyone needs to quit whining.
Quit trying to turn everything into an argument.
Quit trying to always be right.
Quit trying to shove your ways on to others.

Grow up.


Get a premium membership and start a convo with 20 of your friends and talk there about any and everything.


Stop trolling other threads just to report posts.


Grow up.

Was I whining?

 

[Kiki]

yes I am a self professed “card-carrying” member of the @Kiki Nutter club!!

I am dying.

 

[electrycmonk]

Well, I've read the last 5-ish pages and am officially mentally exhausted. I will need to meditate on this as to whether I will add a reply to the dialogue later. I would like to suggest/ask the moderators & Nifty about a point raised a few pages back.

Like the SCOTUS and other lower level panels there is the option for a decenting opinion. Akin to the "minority report" idea. Does the Sys/Mod group have that "tool" in their "toolbox" and does it see use?

As a [________] I fit into a miriade(sp) of groups and sub-cultures. Some very obscure.

I can see with the main goal the Nifty has placed out before us as the "Temporary" changes to the rules in the BYC *House* until the election dust settles. Realistically I can see it staying in place thru the new years holidays and that's just from the hip. It doesn't bother me if it does or doesn't.

Yes, I am a *freeloader* for now. Would I join as a PFM? Sure, I feel it would be worth it to me to invest in it. I have done that in the past to other forums over the last few decades. Will this temporary ruling change make me shy away from a PFM, heck no. It's a logical and we'll thought out plan. One that deals with a very messy topic= the 2020 election. One with no simple solution for a forum like this place has become. I feel that they are doing the best they can with the time they have available to them with this *House* given the rest the world and reality is dealing with a serious mess.

(Heavy sigh) well, I hope that was concise and clear. I gotta go be productive for a few hours.

 

[ChocolateMouse]

Honestly I think most people want to express themselves and be left alone for it. I don't know anyone who actually stalks people in threads they don't participate in to report them.

Well, I've read the last 5-ish pages and am officially mentally exhausted. I will need to meditate on this as to whether I will add a reply to the dialogue later. I would like to suggest/ask the moderators & Nifty about a point raised a few pages back.

Like the SCOTUS and other lower level panels there is the option for a decenting opinion. Akin to the "minority report" idea. Does the Sys/Mod group have that "tool" in their "toolbox" and does it see use?

This is exactly the sort of thing I'm wondering myself and a really good take. Do the mods have specific policies to address minority groups? Because if not, they're bound to get left behind, that's just how systems work. (They're called minorities for a reason...) That's a very sincere question I have and could benefit a lot of people, not just people like me.

I don't mind a no-politics rule exactly. I'm just looking for more confidence in the staff that it'll be enforced conscientiously.

 

[drinkoj]

people all have different definitions of what is acceptable vs what is not....ie my definition of “porn” may be different than yours.....and thus sometimes we are all guilty of “crossing” the line in some way or another.....it HAPPENS occasionally but we have to trust in @Nifty-Chicken and his choice of moderators to ensure that we continue to have good, “clean” poultry and human fun on this site!!

You do know I'm paraphrasing a famous Supreme Court Judge (Potter Stewart) in a ruling about obscenity? If not, you can share your new knowledge at a party and say, ""... and I learned that one the Chicken Forum". LOLOLOL

 

[drinkoj]

Since we got this politics thing under control, can we talk about religion and the designated hitter rule?

 

[muddy75]

Honestly I think most people want to express themselves and be left alone for it. I don't know anyone who actually stalks people in threads they don't participate in to report them.




This is exactly the sort of thing I'm wondering myself and a really good take. Do the mods have specific policies to address minority groups? Because if not, they're bound to get left behind, that's just how systems work. (They're called minorities for a reason...) That's a very sincere question I have and could benefit a lot of people, not just people like me.

I don't mind a no-politics rule exactly. I'm just looking for more confidence in the staff that it'll be enforced conscientiously.

again i defer to addressing your issues in a pm to @Nifty-Chicken if you take issue with HIS choice i. moderators and their decisions!

 

[ChocolateMouse]

again i defer to addressing your issues in a pm to @Nifty-Chicken if you take issue with HIS choice i. moderators and their decisions!

??? You DO know that this IS his thread on the subject, IN the feedback forum?

First I am being banished from kikis threads, now public threads.... Next you will try to banish me from my own threads! My word!

 

[Chickenhappy8708]

I don't want to be argumentative, but I feel like the "Hate has no home here" chickie is a far cry from pro-politician stuff. And it's a lot cuter than any politician, just sayin'!

Do not like that message? It isn't in any way meant to be political. It means no hate, ever. I don't care weather you are white or black, Pro Trump or Pro Biden. Hate has no home here with me.

 

[ChocolateMouse]

Do not like that message? It isn't in any way meant to be political. It means no hate, ever. I don't care weather you are white or black, Pro Trump or Pro Biden. Hate has no home here with me.

I think they meant it was OK, while the rest of the things they mentioned are not.